cd lib/rb
rake package
ls pkg/
tada!
On Nov 11, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Ben Taitelbaum wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
A gem would actually really help me, as it would allow me to keep
track of a versioned dependency on thrift.
- -Ben
On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
We already have code in the Ruby libraries for packaging as a gem.
Gems are clearly the preferred method of managing libraries in the
Ruby world. So why does "make install" in the ruby lib put the
bare library code in site_ruby? This strange arrangement makes it
really, really easy to get yourself confused when developing on
the ruby libs, since the site_ruby install takes precedence over
any gem install.
Is anyone relying on this site_ruby installation behavior, or is
it something we can just get rid of?
-Bryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkZ1k8ACgkQcbwI7gfD0FWCcwCeP5yYCvOYsuktKGvl26C5XJqb
1lsAn2g7vGFltmy+AjU5Fy8MCKVIjwDN
=DGiQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
