We already have code in the Ruby libraries for packaging as a gem.
Gems are clearly the preferred method of managing libraries in the
Ruby world. So why does "make install" in the ruby lib put the bare
library code in site_ruby? This strange arrangement makes it really,
really easy to get yourself confused when developing on the ruby
libs, since the site_ruby install takes precedence over any gem install.
Is anyone relying on this site_ruby installation behavior, or is it
something we can just get rid of?
-Bryan
- Why do Ruby libs still install in site_ruby? Bryan Duxbury
-