Rush Manbert writes:
> I guess that I would say (looking ahead to Eric Anderson's reply to
> your reply) that if you submit a patch that implements something like
> cpp_verbatim in the idl, it should also implement java_verbatim,
> python_verbatim, etc. because that comes essentially for free and you
> don't need to know anything about the different languages. But if you
> submit a patch that lets you do something cool in Erlang I wouldn't
> hold it hostage to the c++ version.
Actually you still have to know about the other languages since you
have to update the generator to do something, and you have to be able
to test it. Just parsing and attaching it to the tree (which would be
easy and I could do) isn't very useful.
-Eric
