[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12669499#action_12669499
]
Bryan Duxbury commented on THRIFT-219:
--------------------------------------
I tend to agree that inheritance is the more appropriate way to get "extended"
Thrift objects. Are there any big downsides to this that I'm missing?
> Inject user-created templates into generated code
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-219
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-219
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Compiler (Java)
> Reporter: Fredrik Hedberg
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: thrift-templates-1.diff
>
>
> Since Java lack the equivalent of C#'s fancy 'partial' class modifier,
> extending the logic of a Thrift-generated class means you have to do it quite
> literally. This patch allows the developer to write code templates that are
> injected into the generated classes by the compiler, allowing him to extend
> the generated classes in any way he wants.
> The code templates are presumed to be found in something like
> /tmpl-java/com/example/Document.tmpl, and are injected into structs and
> services (.Iface and .Client).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
