[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tim Wilson-Brown updated THRIFT-748:
------------------------------------

    Description: 
If a Thrift C++ Client opens a TSocket, writes some data, then calls fork(), 
the child process can terminate the parent processes' connection by deleting 
its copy of the parent TSocket.

In particular,
the default setting of lingerOn_ = 1 causes a RST to be sent in close(socket_) 
in TSocket->close() 

Discussion:

This behaviour is identical to the behaviour of unix sockets when SO_LINGER is 
set (implementations vary).
However, the SO_LINGER default for sockets is off not on. This provides 
unexpected behaviour in TSocket.

This design choice makes it really difficult to program a Thrift client that 
forks other clients in C++, as the first process to call TSocket->close() 
terminates all copies of the connection. The processes all have to call 
TSocket->setLinger(0,0) or (1,timeout) before deleting the TSocket, closing the 
TSocket, or exiting. (This workaround only succeeds with the suggested fix in 
[#THRIFT-747] ).

However, the design choice also prevents deadlock/slowdown issues where a 
forked process holds open a copy of the parent's Thrift connections. It also 
makes close non-blocking, which is ideal in a destructor.

The design choice may also be an attempt to implement the block to send then 
close behaviour described in 
http://blog.netherlabs.nl/articles/2009/01/18/the-ultimate-so_linger-page-or-why-is-my-tcp-not-reliable
However, the default linger interval of 0 turns the linger setting into a hard 
reset.
And in the absence of linger, the kernel can usually send small thrift messages 
by itself.


Options:

  * Change the default lingerOn to 0 - rely on the kernel to resend a limited 
number of times
  * Change the default lingerVal to > 0
    - a large value like INT_MAX would match the default connection, send, and 
recv 'no timeout' behaviour

TODO:
  * Confirm issue on Linux - see attached test code
  * Decide if a change to the defaults is needed
  * Document workaround after resolution of [#THRIFT-747] - call 
TSocket->setLinger(0,0) or (1,timeout) if forking


  was:
If a Thrift C++ Client opens a TSocket, writes some data, then calls fork(), 
the child process can terminate the parent processes' connection by deleting 
its copy of the parent TSocket.

In particular,
the default setting of lingerOn_ = 1 causes a RST to be sent in close(socket_) 
in TSocket->close() 

Discussion:

This behaviour is identical to the behaviour of unix sockets when SO_LINGER is 
set (implementations vary).
However, the SO_LINGER default for sockets is off not on. This provides 
unexpected behaviour in TSocket.

This design choice makes it really difficult to program a Thrift client that 
forks other clients in C++, as the first process to call TSocket->close() 
terminates all copies of the connection. The processes all have to call 
TSocket->setLinger(0,0) before deleting the TSocket, closing the TSocket, or 
exiting. (This workaround only succeeds with the suggested fix in [#THRIFT-747] 
).

However, the design choice also prevents deadlock/slowdown issues where a 
forked process holds open a copy of the parent's Thrift connections. It also 
makes close non-blocking, which is ideal in a destructor.


Options:

Do we want to change the default? What is linger useful for?

TODO:
  * Confirm issue on Linux - see attached test code
  * Decide if a code change is needed
  * Document workaround after resolution of [#THRIFT-747] - call 
TSocket->setLinger(0,0) if forking



Added notes about article at 
http://blog.netherlabs.nl/articles/2009/01/18/the-ultimate-so_linger-page-or-why-is-my-tcp-not-reliable
 describing reliable TCP communication

> C++ TSocket default linger setting breaks forked parent process
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-748
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-748
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Library (C++)
>    Affects Versions: 0.2, 0.3
>         Environment: Cygwin 1.7.1 on Windows XP SP3, Thrift 0.2.0 & r760184 & 
> Trunk
>            Reporter: Tim Wilson-Brown
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: thrift_linger_example.cpp
>
>   Original Estimate: 72h
>  Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> If a Thrift C++ Client opens a TSocket, writes some data, then calls fork(), 
> the child process can terminate the parent processes' connection by deleting 
> its copy of the parent TSocket.
> In particular,
> the default setting of lingerOn_ = 1 causes a RST to be sent in 
> close(socket_) in TSocket->close() 
> Discussion:
> This behaviour is identical to the behaviour of unix sockets when SO_LINGER 
> is set (implementations vary).
> However, the SO_LINGER default for sockets is off not on. This provides 
> unexpected behaviour in TSocket.
> This design choice makes it really difficult to program a Thrift client that 
> forks other clients in C++, as the first process to call TSocket->close() 
> terminates all copies of the connection. The processes all have to call 
> TSocket->setLinger(0,0) or (1,timeout) before deleting the TSocket, closing 
> the TSocket, or exiting. (This workaround only succeeds with the suggested 
> fix in [#THRIFT-747] ).
> However, the design choice also prevents deadlock/slowdown issues where a 
> forked process holds open a copy of the parent's Thrift connections. It also 
> makes close non-blocking, which is ideal in a destructor.
> The design choice may also be an attempt to implement the block to send then 
> close behaviour described in 
> http://blog.netherlabs.nl/articles/2009/01/18/the-ultimate-so_linger-page-or-why-is-my-tcp-not-reliable
> However, the default linger interval of 0 turns the linger setting into a 
> hard reset.
> And in the absence of linger, the kernel can usually send small thrift 
> messages by itself.
> Options:
>   * Change the default lingerOn to 0 - rely on the kernel to resend a limited 
> number of times
>   * Change the default lingerVal to > 0
>     - a large value like INT_MAX would match the default connection, send, 
> and recv 'no timeout' behaviour
> TODO:
>   * Confirm issue on Linux - see attached test code
>   * Decide if a change to the defaults is needed
>   * Document workaround after resolution of [#THRIFT-747] - call 
> TSocket->setLinger(0,0) or (1,timeout) if forking

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to