[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12875715#action_12875715
 ] 

Nathan Marz commented on THRIFT-735:
------------------------------------

That's a fair point. Does it make sense to open a new issue called 
"Deserializer should throw exception if union is missing field", apply my patch 
to fix that, and keep the discussion open on this issue on what the semantics 
for an invalid union on an optional field means? 

> Required field checking is broken when the field type is a Union struct
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-735
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-735
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Compiler (Java), Library (Java)
>    Affects Versions: 0.2
>            Reporter: Bryan Duxbury
>            Assignee: Bryan Duxbury
>             Fix For: 0.4
>
>         Attachments: thrift-735-v2.patch, thrift-735.patch
>
>
> The validate() method on generated structs verifies that required fields are 
> set after validation. However, if the type of the field is a Union struct, 
> then just checking that the field isn't null is not a valid check. The value 
> may be a non-null union, but have an unset field. (We encountered this when 
> deserializing a type that had a union for a field, and the union's set value 
> was an enum value that had been removed from the definition, making it a 
> skip.)
> In order to perform the correct validation, if the value is a Union, then we 
> must also check that the set field and value are non-null.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to