[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12898770#action_12898770
]
Jeff DeCew commented on THRIFT-849:
-----------------------------------
I have a hard time deciding which would be better. Certainly there is a lot of
information that can be inferred from order of types (given that Thrift does
have significant restrictions based on struct and service order), and it is
"wrong" to alphabetize a ToC, but naming conventions are often based on
alphabetical ordering.
I tentatively +1 this patch as I think it emphasizes that ordering is relevant
in Thrift, which is something the intended audience of HTML output may need
reminding of.
> HTML Generator: sorting of Services and Data Types is wrong within TOC
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-849
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-849
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.1, 0.2, 0.3
> Reporter: Roger Meier
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments:
> THRIFT-849_Services_Datatypes_Order__Datatypes_with_Key.patch
>
>
> Sorting of Services and Data Types is alphabetic, instead of the order
> defined in thrift IDL file.
> In addidtion this patch adds the Key attribute to the Data Types Tables.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
