Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: >>That would be the best choice I think, as it preserves the easy >>environment but allows advanced features :P >>Is it possible to have plugins do that much? > > There won't be plugin interface for Thunar 1.0 at least. But it's open > for the next release, iirc
There's already a plugin interface (-> thunarx), but it's simple and thereby limited. The best way to support such kinds of plugins would be turn Thunar into a simple container, where the real functionality is provided completely through plugins (an example would be Eclipse here). Benedikt -- Xfce -- small, stable, fast -- http://www.xfce.org/ (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"... _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
