Brian wrote: > I booted into XP the other day to try out Internet Explorer 7. Here's > the results: > http://members.cox.net/brian-schott/ie_still_sucks.PNG > Exactly the same thing that IE6 did. Is this a good thing, a bad thing, > or just funny? > I have a feeling that the file extension is throwing it off, but the > bigger question is whether or not we care.
Could it be that IE relies entirely on server provided mime information? I guess that would be acceptable even if FF has additional magic to back this up. I wouldn't be surprised though if the server already provides correct mime information but IE botches it up. IE might also choke on the multiple content type declarations in the page header, but I rather doubt it. Anyway, it wouldn't do any harm to use .xml or .html as the extension (and/or remove the extra content type declaration). Not that I personally care about IE or even see myself using it in the foreseeable future. > Brian Schott - Jari _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
