That header hack just was on that site I linked to :P

On 2/13/06, sofar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:05:33 +0100, Nick Schermer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/2/13, sofar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:35:22 +0100, Jannis Pohlmann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:54:44 +0100
>> > There basically are two possible reasons for the IE to have problems
>> > with XHTML:
>> >
>> >   1. .xhtml extension. This should not be necessary as we use XHTML
> 1.0
>> >      (don't we?), which can be delivered with .html.
>> >   2. If sites are delivered with something else than text/html ( e.g.
>> >      application/xhtml+xml). If you're using XHTML 1.0, be sure to
>> >      deliver text/html.
>>
>> it turns out that the default apache ships with the following
> mime.typesentry:
>>
>> application/xml xhtml
>>
>> The 'Application' is what throws off apache. I've changed the current
>> default
>> to 'text' and it seems to work in IE6, but I suggest renaming all the
>> webpages
>> because I will forget to check the mime.types file after an apache
>> upgrade.
>
>
> Ghehe, your just to busy ^_~.


Hey I'm not the one who digs up php header hacks to make this work :^P

Auke

_______________________________________________
Thunar-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev



--
Vincent

http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&amp;id=58682&amp;t=65
_______________________________________________
Thunar-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev

Reply via email to