Stefan Stuhr wrote: >>A good implementation would just conform to the trash-spec. Since >>that's >>not possible in time, we'll stick to ~/.Trash/ for now. That's doable >>in >>time. > > > I was referring to a good implementation of the not-so-good solution. > > If Thunar only will support ~/.Trash/ as trash folder, then the trash > shouldn't be used for files on removable media. Besides that, ~/.Trash/ > is definitely better than no trash at all.
Well, the effort for the good and the not-so-good implementation is nearly the same, so we'll limit to ~/.Trash/ for the first version. > Stefan Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
