On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:37:33 -0300 "Rodrigo Coacci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Erlend Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Samuel Verstraete wrote: > > > Hi Benny, > > > > > > 2 small issues... > > > > > > First: I was wondering if the expected behaviour of overwriting > > > files would be to store the "overwritten" file in the trash... i > > > certainly was expecting this but it might be just me ;) > > > > > You mean if you edit a file called myfile the old (unedited) > > version is stored as myfile~... but you're saying you want the > > myfile~ to be in the trash? > > > > I guess it isn't what he means, even because any FM could be able to > do that... It should be resposability of the editor (or whatever app > you are using) to do it. > I guess what he meant was when you copy/move a file over another > (using Thunar), effectively overwriting it, it could get the > to-be-overwritten file and put it in trash before overwriting it. > But I don't really think this is reasonable... And for big files, > could create a big performance issue, not to tell about disk space.... that's exactly what i mean... copying/moving a file from one folder to another folder in which a file with the same name exists... i don't see the performance issue.... after all you're not physically (or electronically) moving the files... You just say this one is trash and this one is in /home/user... anyway it was just an idea... wasn't really sure what to expect S > > > -- > Abraços, > Rodrigo > _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
