On 12 Aug 2006, at 13:57, Jannis Pohlmann wrote: > On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC), Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:57:28 +0100, Erlend Davidson wrote: >> >>> On 2 Aug 2006, at 17:37, Rodrigo Coacci wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8/2/06, Erlend Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Samuel Verstraete wrote: >>>>> Hi Benny, >>>>> >>>>> 2 small issues... >>>>> >>>>> First: I was wondering if the expected behaviour of overwriting >>>> files >>>>> would be to store the "overwritten" file in the trash... i >>>>> certainly was expecting this but it might be just me ;) >> >> I second that. > > I wouldn't say moving overwritten files to the trash is the expected > behaviour. After all, that's why the "Are you sure you want to > overwrite this file?" message pops up when you try to replace one file > with another. It's not the expected behaviour for us, because expectation comes from past experience - no other file managers implement it. What would a new user expect though? Nothing will ever change if people implement what's already been implemented in other applications. > > So I don't think this should be implemented, not even as an option.
> > - Jannis > _______________________________________________ > Thunar-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
