Jelle de Jong wrote: > Benedikt Meurer wrote: >> Jelle de Jong wrote: >>>>> and what does IIRC means? Why does it looks awkard the screenshot >>>>> doesn't look bad. Nautilus also have these functions btw. >>>> Yes and Nautilus is a mess, hence we conclude... >>>> >>>> Anyway, since we're trying to release it's not the time to mess with the >>>> basics, no matter if it's bad or not that bad at all. >>> Found the problem with the mouse gestures, when you are in view mode: >>> "View as Detailed list" then the mouse gestures don't work. Can this be >>> fixed? >>> >>> So to add a few buttons in the path bar view will look bad, so you don't >>> want to do this? But in tool bar mode it doesn't look bad? >>> >>> Maybe at a extra view mode like a mixed mode with the suggested changes >>> so user can make there own choice. >> For now, we'll focus on release, no messing with the basic GUI. It was >> discussed long ago and this is what 1.0.0 will look like. You can >> however adjust Thunar to your needs as you like. If you check the source >> (or the revision from the bugreport) you'll see it's easy to use the >> path with the toolbar. > Ok, I respect that and leave the path bar stuff by this. But what about > mouse gestures and detailed list view.
File a feature request. Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev