Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-26: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you very much for writing this document - I found it an interesting read. Also, much thanks to Tim Chown for their excellent Ops-Dir review (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-24-opsdir-lc-chown-2024-03-07/), and to the authors for addressing the comments; I think that there is still one remaining unaddressed comment ("In practice, would PTP operate over just one or the other, or might messages be duplicated in each protocol? How does the profile look for a dual-stack environment?"). _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
