TidBITS#726/12-Apr-04
=====================

  The first Mac OS X Trojan horse was spotted last week - or was it?
  Adam looks at Intego's announcement of the MP3Concept Trojan, and
  how it affects the Mac going forward. Also in this issue, Andrew
  Laurence reviews the Slim Devices Squeezebox streaming audio
  player, and we note the releases of Eudora 6.1, DragThing 5.1,
  and NoteBook 1.2 v180. Lastly, we're taking a short break,
  so look for your next issue of TidBITS on 26-Apr-04!

Topics:
    MailBITS/12-Apr-04
    Mac OS X Trojan Technique: Beware Geeks Bearing Gifts
    Good Vibrations from the Squeezebox
    Hot Topics in TidBITS Talk/12-Apr-04

<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-726.html>
<ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/2004/TidBITS#726_12-Apr-04.etx>

Copyright 2004 TidBITS: Reuse governed by Creative Commons license
   <http://www.tidbits.com/terms/> Contact: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by:
* Make friends and influence people by sponsoring TidBITS!
   Put your company and products in front of tens of thousands of
   savvy, committed Macintosh users who actually buy stuff.
   For more information and rates, email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

* READERS LIKE YOU! Help keep TidBITS great via our voluntary <------ NEW!
   contribution program. Special thanks this week to Shady Kanfi,
   Robin Armstrong, and Lilajane Frascarelli for their support!
   <http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>

* SMALL DOG ELECTRONICS: PowerBooks On Sale! <----------------------- NEW!
   PB 15" G4/1 GHz 512 MB RAM, SuperDrive Only $1839! 15" G4/1 GHz
   with Combo drive $1669! PowerBook 12" G4/867 SuperDrive $1329!
   Visit: <http://www.smalldog.com/tb/> 802-496-7171

* GET FETCH FOR FREE! Fetch Softworks makes Fetch, the original <---- NEW!
   Macintosh FTP client, free for educational and charitable use.
   Apply today at <http://fetchsoftworks.com/edapply>!

* Dr. Bott, LLC: We got into this business because we love
   computer stuff. We now have the chance - the DUTY - to sit and
   geek out with technology every day under the guise of "work."
   And if it's cool enough, we sell it. <http://www.drbott.com/>

* Web Crossing: Free _Web Crossing Express_ now adds discussions &
   plug-ins (low-volume) to the unlimited Web/FTP/email server.
   Plug-ins add blogs, wikis, RSS, & more. Perfect for small biz,
   families or clubs. Try it! <http://www.webcrossing.com/tb-304>

* Treat yourself to something better! Matias brings you: <----------- NEW!
   Tactile Pro Keyboard: <http://tactilepro.com/>
   Laptop Armor cases: <http://laptoparmor.com/>
   iPod Armor case: <http://ipodarmor.com/>

* Bare Bones Software TextWrangler 1.5 -- General-purpose tool for <- NEW!
   composing, modifying, and transforming text. Now with full
   AppleScript support! US$49. For more info, to download a demo,
   or to purchase a copy, visit <http://www.barebones.com/>.
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

MailBITS/12-Apr-04
------------------

**No TidBITS 19-Apr-04** -- We're taking the next issue of TidBITS
  off for a little hard-earned rest and recuperation in Hawaii at my
  sister Jennifer's wedding. Those who have been with us from the
  beginning may remember that back in 1992, Jennifer converted our
  first 99 issues from HyperCard format into setext, which was an
  essential step in allowing us to provide a complete archive
  containing every TidBITS issue. Aside from the wedding
  festivities, Tonya and I are looking forward to downtime and
  extra sleep to make up for what we've lost in the last week
  while dealing with Tristan's cold-exacerbated asthma troubles.
  So, although we'll try to keep TidBITS Talk flowing, we won't be
  reading or replying to other email on a regular basis. Our next
  issue will be released on 26-Apr-04. [ACE]


**Matias Sponsoring TidBITS** -- We're pleased to announce our
  latest long-term sponsor, Matias Corporation, makers of the
  Tactile Pro Keyboard, and the Laptop Armor and iPod Armor
  hardshell cases. Matias first caught our attention back in 2001
  with their Half Keyboard, an unusual halved QWERTY keyboard that
  used the spacebar as a modifier key to access the missing keys.
  Although neat enough to warrant mention in consecutive Macworld
  Superlatives articles, the Half Keyboard was attractive primarily
  in very specific situations (such as when portable data entry to
  a Palm OS handheld was necessary), and it's great to see Matias
  devoting their design sensibility to more mainstream products like
  the Tactile Pro Keyboard and the two hardshell cases. We've been
  impressed both with Matias's products and the company itself, so
  we couldn't be happier to include Matias among our select group
  of sponsors. [ACE]

<http://halfkeyboard.com/>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06287>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06508>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=07607>


**Eudora 6.1 Adds Google Searching** -- Qualcomm has released
  Eudora 6.1, the latest version of their venerable email client.
  New in Eudora 6.1 is a toolbar-based Search Bar that enables you
  to search either within Eudora or in Google via your Web browser;
  you can also Control- or right-click a word and choose it from the
  contextual menu that appears to search for it in Google. Another
  new feature (though a more-limited version appeared in Eudora 6.0;
  see "Eudora 6.0 Slams Spam, Concentrates Content" in TidBITS-696_
  for more on that release) is Transfer to Selection, which enables
  you to Control- or right-click a word in Eudora and choose a
  similarly named mailbox into which the message will be
  transferred. IMAP synchronization has been improved with the
  capability to synchronize specific IMAP mailboxes on mail checks
  and easier resynchronization of entire mail folders. Eudora 6.1
  provides more control over content concentration, which it uses
  to hide quoted and other less relevant text appearing in the
  preview pane. Lastly, and perhaps the most welcome (if depressing)
  feature is the addition of Junk mail statistics to the Statistics
  window. It's harsh being shown that 61 percent of my mail is spam
  overall, and that the percentage is more like 75 to 78 percent
  for the day or week.

<http://www.eudora.com/email/>
<http://www.eudora.com/download/eudora/mac/6.1/Release_Notes.txt>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=07342>

  Eudora 6.1 is available in Paid mode for $50; Sponsored (with ads
  and no support) and Light (reduced features and no support) modes
  are free. If you've purchased or upgraded Eudora within the last
  12 months, the upgrade is free; if you purchased or upgraded more
  than 12 months ago, but less than 24 months ago, the upgrade costs
  $40; and if you last paid for it more than 24 months ago, you have
  to pay the full $50 again. Eudora 6.1 is a 6 MB download for
  either Mac OS X or Mac OS 9. [ACE]

<http://www.eudora.com/download/>


**Version 5.1: A DragThing of Beauty** -- TLA Systems's DragThing,
  a launcher and Dock replacement that we've been covering since its
  inception, has been upgraded to version 5.1. The big change here
  is that DragThing's docks are now documents: you can now open and
  close them individually, and they can be exported completely as
  XML. This makes things much easier when you develop a one-off or
  specialized dock that needn't be present all the time. You can
  also have "workspaces" (dock sets), read-only docks, and
  stationery docks. The Desktop Trash feature is also much more
  flexible, and there are many cosmetic and functional improvements
  and bug fixes. DragThing 5.1 requires Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar or
  better and is a 3.2 MB download. It costs $30; this is a free
  upgrade for DragThing 5 users. [MAN]

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=07402>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=01488>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06939>
<http://www.dragthing.com/english/whatsnew.shtml>
<http://www.dragthing.com/english/download.html>


**NoteBook 1.2 v180 Beefs up HTML Export** -- Circus Ponies
  Software has released NoteBook 1.2 v180, a minor upgrade to their
  elegant snippet keeper and information manager, which I've found
  handy for maintaining to do lists and taking notes on complex
  procedures. This version adds an option to export only changed
  pages to HTML, preserves text styling in HTML, and automatically
  converts a series of multiple spaces to a non-breaking space
  character. You can also now choose the format for images pasted
  into Notebook. Circus Ponies also fixed a number of bugs,
  including an annoying one with the licensing system that could
  cause a crash on the first launch after restarting your Mac.
  NoteBook 1.2 v180 is a 7.7 MB download that's free to registered
  users; new copies cost $50. [ACE]

<http://www.circusponies.com/pages.aspx?page=products>
<http://www.circusponies.com/help/11.whats_new/1.releasenotes.htm>
<http://www.circusponies.com/pages.aspx?page=downloads>


Mac OS X Trojan Technique: Beware Geeks Bearing Gifts
-----------------------------------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  By now, assuming you pay any attention to the Macintosh media in
  between your weekly doses of TidBITS, you've undoubtedly heard of
  the hubbub brewing around the announcement last Thursday of the
  first Trojan horse to target Mac OS X. The news came from Intego,
  the developers of a variety of security software, including the
  anti-virus program VirusBarrier, which Intego updated to detect
  hypothetical malicious software using this new technique.

  Should we laud Intego's integrity in alerting the Macintosh
  community to this possible pestilence, or should we revile the
  company for a self-serving PR move that has the potential to cause
  untold headaches for the entire Macintosh world? I'll reveal my
  hand here - if Intego wants to do public service announcements,
  they shouldn't use a press release to submit their findings, and
  they should stop selling a product that stands to benefit directly
  from both the increased paranoia they've caused and a potential
  plague of copycat Trojans.


**Just the Facts, Ma'am** -- Toward the end of March 2004,
  a discussion took place on the Usenet group comp.sys.mac.-
  programmer.misc about the potential for embedding malicious
  code inside an MP3 file. After some back and forth, programmer
  Bo Lindbergh posted a proof-of-concept file that is an MP3
  and plays in iTunes, but is actually also an application. Bo's
  proof-of-concept merely popped up a dialog box, but it obviously
  could execute any sort of code. It's a clever hack that takes
  advantage of both the way Carbon applications work and the ID3
  tag portion of the MP3 file format to run executable code from
  within a legitimate MP3 file. It's worth noting that all of the
  programming techniques used by Bo's proof-of-concept are perfectly
  legitimate, and the only vulnerability this exposes is the ability
  of a programmer to disguise an application as a document. Nothing
  new there, and it's well worth reading the technical commentary
  posted on BoingBoing by Miro Jurisic (a top-tier Macintosh
  programmer known for winning the MacHax Group's Best Hack
  Contest at MacHack on multiple occasions).

<http://groups.google.com/groups?th=631707378ffe9292&seekm=
blgl-5D750C.02150821032004%40news.bahnhof.se>
<http://www.boingboing.net/2004/04/08/first_malware_for_os.html>

  On 20-Mar-04, Intego said that an unnamed person reported this
  proof-of-concept Trojan to Intego, Symantec, Network Associates,
  and Apple. Intego evaluated the code and added some code to
  VirusBarrier to detect it. So far so good. But then, despite some
  "initial hesitation," Intego decided to put out a press release
  trumpeting how the update to VirusBarrier detects "the first
  Trojan horse for Mac OS X." Open bottle, extract genie.

<http://www.intego.com/news/pr40.html>

  Needless to say, the press release was immediately covered by a
  variety of news sites (I've included a selection of links below;
  it's amusing to compare them, and be sure to see the hilarious
  Joy of Tech cartoon at the end). As usual, that means a few sites
  confirmed the story, investigated the technical claims, and
  queried security experts, whereas many others merely reprinted
  or pointed to Intego's press release. The massive coverage
  instantly generated a ton of confusion and misunderstandings.
  Many people thought Mac OS X was immune from such malevolent code
  (false, and the proof-of-concept works equally well in Mac OS 9),
  which led to the conclusion that Intego was promulgating a hoax
  (equally false). Other misapprehensions that quickly resulted were
  that this was a virus (false, Trojans don't self-replicate) and
  that it was in some way related to Apple's success in the music
  world (inane, and at best a non-sequitur). Intego itself generated
  other confusions, such as the implication that what was being
  identified was an actual Trojan horse (false) rather than just
  a method by which a Trojan horse could be created. Intego is also
  culpable for classic FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) tactics
  by advertising that the same technique could be used with GIF and
  JPEG files, and QuickTime movies (true, but irrelevant).

<http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/2004/04/08/trojan/>
<http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/2004/04/09/appletrojan/>
<http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/08/1922237&;
mode=thread&tid=126&tid=172>
<http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,63000,00.html>
<http://us.cnn.com/2004/TECH/Internet/04/09/apple.trojan/index.html>
<http://joyoftech.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/548.html>


**Clear and Present Terminology** -- Let's step back and look at
  what the terms for the various types of malicious software really
  mean. Viruses are pieces of executable code that that can't stand
  alone, but must be inserted into and operate within a "host file,"
  usually an application. Most importantly, viruses self-replicate,
  inserting their code into other files as a way of moving from one
  file to another, and one computer to another. Although worms also
  replicate themselves, they don't require a host file and exist as
  standalone files.

<http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/nav.nsf/docid/1999041209131106>

  A Trojan is a horse of a different color. Like worms, Trojans
  are standalone programs, but they don't self-replicate. Instead,
  they're designed to deceive an unwary user into downloading them
  and launching; as a rule, they can be identified precisely (which
  allows warnings of "If you see a file called 'Trojan Horses' that
  purports to provide a directory of farriers in the Middle East,
  don't run it or it will delete all the files on your hard disk!").
  Without detracting from the clever technique that Bo Lindbergh
  came up with, Trojans are trivially easy to write. That's because
  all they have to do is deceive you long enough for a double-click.
  Once you double-click, the Greeks leap from the horse and it's all
  over for Troy and your computer. (In case you're not up on your
  Homer, we can thank Odysseus for the original Trojan Horse.)

  Bo's proof-of-concept was primarily interesting for what it did
  after it was double-clicked: it acted like a normal MP3 document.
  Also interesting was the fact that it could be dragged into iTunes
  and played like any other MP3 file. But despite having the data
  fork of a legitimate MP3 file, it was in fact an application, and
  the Finder's Get Info window properly identified it as such. In
  essence, the proof-of-concept was more deceptive after the fact,
  which, had it been an actual Trojan horse, might have made it
  somewhat harder to detect. But as it was neither malicious nor
  deceptive, the proof-of-concept simply was not a Trojan horse.
  That said, it was a questionable move to post such a proof-of-
  concept in public.


**Think Like Intego** -- So why did Intego decide to issue a press
  release about what the company dubbed the MP3Concept Trojan?
  Obviously, I wasn't privy to the discussions (or I would have
  told them in no uncertain terms what a terrible idea this was),
  but it seems likely that the decision was in the end based on the
  positive benefits it would have for Intego. After all, promoting
  corporate interests is what PR is all about.

  The reasoning is easy to follow. With just a little effort in
  the press release, Intego could both catapult the company into
  the spotlight of the Macintosh media and engender a sense of
  paranoia in the Macintosh community that would result in sales
  of VirusBarrier. For examples of how the wording of the press
  release supports this goal, consider this: "While the first
  versions of this Trojan horse that Intego has isolated are
  benign, this technique opens the door to more serious risks."
  The sentence manages to imply that Intego discovered the Trojan
  (it was actually reported to them by a user) and at the same
  time states that there are multiple versions of the Trojan.
  As far as I've been able to determine, and Intego did not
  answer my direct question to this point, at the time when
  this press release was sent out, there was only Bo Lindbergh's
  proof-of-concept.

  Then there's this section: "Due to the use of this technique,
  users can no longer safely double-click MP3 files in Mac OS X.
  This same technique could be used with JPEG and GIF files, though
  no such cases of infected graphic files have yet been seen."
  That's classic FUD aimed at scaring less-sophisticated users into
  believing that they cannot so much as double-click an MP3, JPEG,
  or GIF file without risking untold digital horrors. Unless, that
  is, they're running Intego's VirusBarrier.

  So Intego gains massive press coverage, and even if it turned
  negative, there's always the aphorism, "I don't care what you
  say about me as long you spell my name right." Intego also sees
  increased sales of VirusBarrier, lending a direct financial bonus
  to the announcement. If nothing else, Intego's behavior was crass,
  very much along the lines of the anti-virus companies whose
  software identifies worm-generated email but, instead of deleting
  it, wastes even more time and resources by bouncing it back to the
  forged address with an advertisement for the anti-virus software.
  Although those companies haven't yet been taken to task for such
  tactics, Intego may suffer a significantly damaged reputation from
  this decision.

  Intego calls itself an "i-security company" and talks on its About
  page about how it is committed to "protecting your computer from
  security threats of all kinds." Ignoring the utterly cynical
  thought that Intego would wish ill upon those who were not its
  customers, by releasing the announcement of MP3Concept, Intego
  violated that basic goal of protecting computers from security
  threats of all kinds. That's because the publicity that surrounded
  both the initial press release and Intego's followup Q&A document
  about MP3Concept significantly lowers the bar for creating Trojan
  horses using the MP3Concept approach. I would be surprised if
  actual MP3Concept Trojans hadn't been released into the wild now,
  given that most people writing malicious software generally just
  modify techniques and code from others. So by providing details
  about how MP3Concept works, how it could affect GIF and JPEG
  files, and more, Intego almost ensured that some disaffected
  programmer would implement it. Do you feel that Intego's
  announcement has helped protect your Mac from security threats?

<http://www.intego.com/intego/>
<http://www.intego.com/news/pr41.html>

  Intego would certainly argue that the information would have
  gotten out anyway. That may be true, since the information about
  the proof-of-concept was protected only by obscurity. But the
  Internet is an awfully big place these days, and just because
  some piece of information is available doesn't mean it will
  automatically be introduced to hundreds of thousands of Macintosh
  users. Lots of programmers discover ways of abusing operating
  systems that they either don't act on or don't publicize. Intego
  chose to go public.


**What Should Intego Have Done?** It's said that hindsight is
  always 20/20, but in this case, I think it's clear how Intego
  should have responded. First, I think Intego should absolutely
  have updated the virus definitions for VirusBarrier to identify
  and delete any Trojan horses using the MP3Concept technique.
  That's entirely in line with the mission of protecting computers
  from security threats of all kinds, and I have nothing against
  Intego using this information to improve its products.

  However, Intego should next have verified that the right people
  at Apple had received the information, assuming that a Macintosh
  developer like Intego would have better contacts within Apple than
  a random user. Intego said the reporting user had also alerted
  Apple, but we all know that Apple is a very large company, and
  sending an email message to a general feedback address is a lot
  different from making sure Apple's security team was aware of the
  problem. The Apple Product Security page provides a email address
  to which such security vulnerabilities should be reported.

<http://www.apple.com/support/security/>

  Intego could also have alerted an independent security
  organization like the CERT Coordination Center to the
  vulnerability. That would have allowed CERT to verify the
  vulnerability, alert Apple again, and publish the information
  in a controlled fashion. Then, had the information become public,
  Intego wouldn't have been tainted by a blatant conflict of
  interest and could still have announced that VirusBarrier had
  been updated to deal with the problem.

<http://www.cert.org/>


**What Should You Do?** The cat's out of the bag, and thanks
  to Intego's self-serving behavior, the Macintosh world is a
  less trusting place than it was this time last week. So what's
  your actual vulnerability to Trojans (or worms, because self-
  replicating code could be added) using the MP3Concept technique?
  I hope that, apart from a few quick copycats from programmers
  without the skill or creativity to produce anything worthwhile,
  we won't see many implementations, which means that most people
  won't have to worry about anything most of the time. Also
  reassuring is the fact that downloading a raw MP3, JPEG, or
  GIF file from an FTP or Web site (or one of the file sharing
  networks) is unlikely to expose you to an MP3Concept Trojan horse
  because Macintosh resource forks aren't transmitted when such
  files are downloaded unless the file is first encoded in a StuffIt
  archive, MacBinary file, BinHex file, or on a disk image.

  That said, I encourage you to be cautious about files you receive
  in email, since email programs will use the AppleDouble or BinHex
  encodings to ensure that a file's resource fork is protected.
  Luckily, good email programs like Eudora and Mail refuse to let
  you launch an application attached to a message without prompting
  you first; if you ever see a query from your email program about
  executing an attachment, cancel the launch and investigate the
  source of the attachment.

  If you regularly receive files in email and download files from
  Web sites of unknown reputation, I recommend that you run and
  regularly update an anti-virus application. On a technical basis,
  I don't know of any particular differences between Symantec's
  Norton AntiVirus, McAfee's Virex, and Intego's VirusBarrier,
  but I can't encourage supporting Intego after this incident.
  Symantec's Norton AntiVirus costs $70 from Symantec, though I
  instead generally recommend the $130 Norton SystemWorks bundle
  (which also includes Norton Utilities, Dantz's Retrospect Express,
  and Aladdin's Spring Cleaning). McAfee's Virex doesn't seem
  to be as readily available as Norton AntiVirus, but remember
  that you get it for free with a $100 .Mac membership, which
  is a good deal.

<http://www.symantec.com/nav/nav_mac/>
<http://www.symantec.com/sabu/sysworks/mac/>
<http://www.nai.com/us/products/mcafee/antivirus/desktop/virex.htm>
<http://www.mac.com/>

  I don't currently know what methods Norton AntiVirus and Virex
  use to identify potential MP3Concept Trojans, but according to
  some Usenet discussions, VirusBarrier merely looks for any CFM
  executable whose name ends with a common filename extension. As
  a result, it apparently incorrectly identifies some plug-ins for
  Adobe Photoshop Elements and Adobe InDesign CS as being Trojan
  horses. Oops.

  One final point to drive home: regular backups (and not just
  duplicates) can protect you from a multitude of evils ranging from
  an overeager anti-virus application to a malicious Trojan horse.


**What Happens Next?** Intego's media maelstrom elicited
  a statement from Apple, which is unusual for security
  vulnerabilities. As the Apple Product Security page states,
  "For the protection of our customers, Apple does not disclose,
  discuss or confirm security issues until a full investigation
  has occurred and any necessary patches or releases are available."
  In response to our query, an Apple representative said, "We are
  aware of the potential issue identified by Intego and are working
  proactively to investigate it. While no operating system can
  be completely secure from all threats, Apple has an excellent
  track record of identifying and rapidly correcting potential
  vulnerabilities."

  I'd be a little surprised if Apple actually had been working
  on this issue before Intego's announcement, since the proof-of-
  concept doesn't do anything illegal. Had it not been described
  in the Usenet posting, it would have been deceptive, sure, but a
  custom icon and a misleading name are also deceptive, and there's
  nothing Apple can do to prevent them. I've seen a number of ideas
  for ways Apple could modify the Mac OS to reduce the likelihood of
  a user launching a Trojan, including putting a subtle halo around
  the icons of applications (thus reducing the deceptive nature of
  Trojans masquerading as documents) and requiring user assent to
  the first launch of any newly downloaded application. Neither
  of these approaches would be complete protection, but they might
  lower the likelihood of someone running a Trojan without warning.
  Whether or not Apple was working on this issue ahead of time, I'm
  sure Apple programmers are evaluating it now, and it's entirely
  likely that Apple will release a security update in the near
  future to address MP3Concept's method of deceiving users.

  In the end, the only real solution to the overall problem of
  malicious code would likely be a major rearchitecting of Mac OS X
  in such a way that prevents applications from causing damage.
  I doubt Apple would go to such lengths because of the cost of
  such a wholesale change, particularly given the minimal actual
  damage to Macs caused by malicious software so far.


Good Vibrations from the Squeezebox
-----------------------------------
  by Andrew Laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  (When last we left our intrepid music junkie, he was annoyed that
  the Slim Devices SLIMP3 streamed MP3 music, rather than being a
  disk-based storage and playback device like his beloved TiVo.
  Let's see how things have progressed.)

  Since I reviewed the SLIMP3 last year (see "SLIMP3: MP3, Get Thee
  to the Hi-Fi" in TidBITS-676_), disk-based media players have
  either vanished or morphed into the "home theater PC," but media-
  streaming devices have flourished. As just a few examples, Alex
  Hoffman reviewed TiVo's Home Media Option ("TiVo Series2 Improves
  on Original" in TidBITS-698_); Gateway introduced their Connected
  DVD Player; Turtle Beach soldiers on with their venerable
  AudioTron AT-100; and MacSense is finally shipping the HomePod.
  The market has spoken: streaming it is.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=07150>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=07366>
<http://www.gateway.com/home/ce/dvd.shtml>
<http://www.turtlebeach.com/site/products/audiotron/>
<http://www.macsense.com/product/homepod/>


**Enter the Squeezebox** -- Slim Devices introduced the Squeezebox
  in November 2003. With a new look and a slew of new features, it
  replaces the SLIMP3 as Slim Devices' flagship hardware product.
  Where the SLIMP3 felt like an exercise in home-brew hardware, the
  Squeezebox looks and feels like high-quality consumer electronics.
  It retains the SLIMP3's excellent vacuum fluorescent display (VFD)
  but is packaged in a slimmer, more attractive case. The SLIMP3's
  stark black metal is replaced with a rubberized exterior. The
  display is no longer angled upward, but faces directly outward
  just like the rest of your hi-fi components. The unit is much
  more at home in the entertainment center, or on a desk or dresser.
  Inside, the Squeezebox plants itself directly at the demographic
  intersection between computer and audio enthusiasts. A wired
  version connects to a 10/100/1000Base-T wired Ethernet network;
  a wireless version adds the capability to connect to an 802.11b
  wireless network. Your streaming audio is delivered to the stereo
  via either analog RCA or digital optical or coaxial jacks.

<http://www.slimdevices.com/>

  The Squeezebox's setup is remarkably intuitive. After a series
  of questions guides you through setup for your network, the box
  is off and running. In a nice improvement over the SLIMP3, the
  Squeezebox automatically detects if a new firmware version is
  on the server, and prompts the user to upgrade.

  Where the SLIMP3's digital-to-analog converter only handled MP3
  audio, the Squeezebox supports most popular formats: AAC (on Mac
  or Windows), AIFF, FLAC, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV or WMA (Windows
  only). AAC, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis and WMA files are supported through
  server-side conversion into uncompressed audio; the conversion
  is only available for files that aren't protected by digital
  rights management, as are those purchased from the iTunes Music
  Store. In other words, the songs you rip into AAC or WMA are
  playable, but purchased (and protected) songs are not playable.
  (AAC playback requires QuickTime and is therefore only available
  on Mac and Windows servers. The Ogg and FLAC formats require
  that those programs be already installed on the server.)

  The Squeezebox's interface is exactly the same as the SLIMP3, and
  you control its functions via either the included remote control
  or the server's Web interface. See my earlier review for
  descriptions of its operation.


**SlimServer** -- The SlimServer software, which is installed on
  the Mac hosting your music files, remains an impressively robust
  and flexible music platform. Where most players lock you into
  iTunes's predefined constructs of songs, albums and playlists,
  the SlimServer incorporates an "internal playlist" concept that
  opens the door to ad-hoc playlists. You can build a playlist
  for the moment, intermixing any number of songs, albums or
  pre-defined playlists; any unit of music available to iTunes
  can be a component of an ad-hoc playlist. I've always dreamed
  of an unending stream of music, limited only by my mood and
  imagination. With SlimServer, that dream has arrived (and yes,
  I know full well that I sound like I'm spouting advertising copy).

  As testament to the strength of the SlimServer platform,
  competitor Roku Labs has adopted the GPL-licensed open-source
  SlimServer software for their not-yet-shipping Roku SoundBridge.
  Roku's literature proudly lists the device's support for multiple
  audio formats, the Web server interface, iTunes support, and
  compatibility with multiple operating systems. Interestingly,
  the SoundBridge appears to also use a VFD display. If imitation
  is the sincerest form of flattery, adoption must point to sheer
  adoration.

<http://www.rokulabs.com/products/soundbridge/>


**Costs and Benefits** -- Streaming music devices all seem to be
  priced around $200. However, just as Macs cost more than PCs, the
  Squeezebox costs a bit more; enough to make you say "hmmm." The
  wired version costs $250; adding wireless bumps the price to $300.
  Although the Squeezebox is full-featured and rightfully claims a
  spot in the consumer electronics milieu, the price feels a bit
  high to me. Otherwise, the Squeezebox is a heck of a nice product.

  While I was writing the SLIMP3 review, my wife and I noticed
  that we played music more often, and more easily. The seamless
  access to the music heightened our use and enjoyment a great
  deal, similar to the yield one gets from TiVo. After I sent
  the demonstration unit back to Slim Devices, we noticed its
  absence. Forced to once again shuffle CDs, we lapsed into old
  habits of leaving the same set of discs in the player and
  suffering through commercial radio. Now that we've gotten
  our hands on the Squeezebox, I just might have to buy one
  for the entertainment center.

  [Andrew Laurence has almost figured out how to store all his
  CDs in the living room. Almost.]


   PayBITS: If this article helped you, consider contributing
   a few bucks so Andrew can buy a Squeezebox of his own.
   <https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=atlauren%40uci.edu>
   Read more about PayBITS: <http://www.tidbits.com/ paybits/>


Hot Topics in TidBITS Talk/12-Apr-04
------------------------------------
  by TidBITS Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  As before, the second URL below each thread description points
  to the discussion on our Web Crossing server, which will be much
  faster, though it doesn't yet use our preferred design.

<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/>


**Intego Trojan Warning** -- Readers discuss Intego's press
  release about the MP3Concept Trojan horse. (7 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2215>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/77>


**Floppy Server?** Truly, we limit April Fools topics to April 1
  issues, so rest assured that this thread is a serious discussion
  of how to mount remotely an old Mac that's booted from a floppy
  disk. (8 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2214>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/76>


**LaunchBar vs. Quicksilver** -- The venerable application
  launcher LaunchBar is seeing competition from upstart Quicksilver.
  How do the two compare? (14 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2212>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/73>


**QWERTY and Dvorak** -- Adam's article on the Matias Tactile Pro
  keyboard reignites discussion of which keyboard layout is superior
  (and whether there's actually a difference). (3 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2210>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/72>


**Recommended Laptop Bags** -- Following Jeff Carlson's article on
  buying a laptop bag, readers weigh in with their own favorite
  brands and essential bag criteria. (10 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2209>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/71>



$$

 Non-profit, non-commercial publications may reprint articles if
 full credit is given. Others please contact us. We don't guarantee
 accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and
 company names may be registered trademarks of their companies.

 For information: how to subscribe, where to find back issues,
 and more, see <http://www.tidbits.com/>. TidBITS ISSN 1090-7017.
 Send comments and editorial submissions to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Back issues available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/>
 And: <ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/>
 Full text searching available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/search/>
 -------------------------------------------------------------------






Reply via email to