> you guys are demonizing me for what appears to be a pretty legitimate > question and line of inquiry.
I think there's a misunderstanding here; yours is indeed a legitimate question, and we're really not trying to demonize or attack you in any way. Since your original idea of hiding the source code turns out to be largely infeasible (as explained in our original posts), we're offering alternative perspectives that might enable you to go through with your plan to create a TiddlyWiki-based application. So we're not being fanatical, trying to force you to open-source your work - it merely seems that it's impossible to entirely hide the code in the environment TiddlyWiki works in. In fact, TiddlyWiki's using the BSD license precisely because it allows a large degree of freedom and flexibility in terms of modifying and redistributing the code* - that includes reuse for commercial purposes. Nevertheless, I apologize if that came across as offensive. > VBA is essentially "open source" in that it's bundled into Excel. I'm afraid that's not what open source means. -- F. * http://www.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/TiddlyWiki_License --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
