Alex, Hey thanks. Re: "you increase exposure to risk in not taking a > risk so it might be worth taking the risk"
I think that was a line from Abbot and Costello's "Who's On First" routine. I actually do mathematical modeling (optimization and simulation) and other stuff to earn a living. So there's more of an opportunity cost (risk) if I developed something in TW but could not capture revenue from it. Because I'd have to set aside the quant stuff. I see what you are saying about a TiddlyStyle". I've been thinking about that too. Take for example Monkey Tiddly and Eric's plug-ins for themes, navigation, sliders, etc. Well their mods to the Shadow Tiddlers sometimes crash into each other. But there may be value in a mashup rather than in selecting a single design paradigm. That's the js tweak work that I think may be required to develop a slick end user app. I'm sure other guys have thought of this already. But I think a new avenue of creative work lies in leveraging the great plug in libraries synergistically. Or something like that... Steve On Jan 10, 2:42 pm, "Alex Hough" <[email protected]> wrote: > SteveM > > It would be interesting to hear about your niche applications. > > Developing one 'TiddlyStyle' might give some insight into some > innovative business practice. > > The Fractal Organization [1] mentions Adams law which states something > to the effect that there you increase exposure to risk in not taking a > risk so it might be worth taking the risk in disclosing your idea(s). > > Alex > > [1]http://tinyurl.com/9wruht --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
