While Wagn is a nice addition to the WikiWorld, TW still has a major advantage; it's dependencies are found on many machines and multiple OS's, making TW much more portable than Wagn. I carry my TW's on a USB drive, allowing me to access them from almost any machine.
On Jun 12, 7:35 am, Måns <humam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry - I forgot to post the address:http://wagn.org > > On 12 Jun., 13:34, Måns <humam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi TwWizards.. > > > I just discovered Wagn - a new wikiengine - wiki on wheels. (Ruby on > > rails) > > It looks and behaves very much like TiddlyWiki, and I wonder if you > > couldn't just replace their "cards" with tiddlers in some sense? > > > It looks very promising - and I think it deserves a close look, when > > thinking of setting up a multiuser TiddlyWiki-like engine... As I > > understand it's opensource - and uses Ruby as framework for the > > servercomponents... "needs: ruby (1.8.4 or 1.8.6) and either Postgres > > or Mysql" > > > regards Måns Mårtensson --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
