On Jul 5, 1:16 am, FND <[email protected]> wrote: > So from my perspective, just keeping those lines - perhaps in black > though - is the way to go.
I agree and have done as you suggest. Morris On Jul 4, 6:30 am, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > Something unrelated to the menu, Morris. > I have a copy of that TWT. I've you can give me some pointers for > installing it in TWT-Blackicity-Accordion, I'd like to try to do so. Sorry Eric, for me that ship may have already sailed along with the code:-) If you have a copy of it email it to me along with instructions as to what you mean and I'll let you know. On Jul 4, 9:21 pm, Tobias Beer <[email protected]> wrote: > A few things... > > 1) As "add >> subtopic" is equivalent to "new here", I think it is an > important piece of information to say directly that the menu works > through tagging ...because, if you'd ever want to rearrange things, > you'd only have to tag differently. See CreateNewBranches. > 2) I know it is stupid, but if you'd (accidentally) tag a topmenu item > with the name of a submenu item, you'd get a macro error (infinite > loop?)... don't know if that's supposed to be so. Yes it is the case that if you tell a tiddler to refer to itself in any form you get a loop. TiddlyWiki is a goal seeking machine and will do what you tell it to even if sometimes it's ill advised. If it's an accident you should be more careful:-) If you do it on purpose it's time consuming and you have time to go out and get another beer, no pun intended :-) > 3) If I create a tiddler and tag it with the name of any of the items > already in the menu, it will be displayed in the menu... I think it > were better if only those items ended up in a treeview menu, that are > actually tagged "treeview" ...or even better tagged with the rootnode. You could probably do this if you wish. I might consider adopting it if you do. > 4) Whatever happened to "tagging"?!? To remove it seems quite bad. If > you had tiddlers that were not in the menu, but still use tagging, you > would only see the tag relation in the tiddler that is tagging but no > reference in the tiddler which is the tag. I'm not exactly sure what you mean. > Some grammar: > > "Thunb (flash) drive" > "TiddlersBar tabs that can be toggled and off." Thanks, fixed Morris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
