Ciao Mohammad

I better understand it now.

I want to re-phrase my comment.

Is "Utility Plugin" the closest term to its aim? "Utility" is very generic. 
It lacks any definition of scope.

But, from what you wrote, it seems more like a "Documentation Assistant"?

Just a thought!!! No WAY do I dislike it. Just wonder if the naming is 
relevantly precise?

Best wishes
Josiah

On Monday, 14 October 2019 22:02:54 UTC+2, Mohammad wrote:
>
> The Utility plugin is a set of tools can be used for any purpose! but it 
> is specially useful when you are writing something to explain the TW itself 
> or a plugin, script and like that!
> So, in normal use one does not need to have wikitext-example macro!
>
> Tha't is the reason I said it is good for developer.
>
> It is different from TW-Script where, TW-Scripts is a resource and 
> TW-Utility is a plugin! and part of it cannot be found in TW-Scripts!
> Furthermore TW-Scripts is a resource, a reference wiki NOT a plugin!
>
> --Mohammad
>
> On Monday, October 14, 2019 at 10:04:02 PM UTC+3:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>>
>> This is to announce the *beta *release Utility plugin! It is a 
>>> complement to Shiraz. This plugin targets who like authoring specially 
>>> developer.
>>
>>
>> Its good. Its useful.
>>
>> But I'm not sure (yet) whether its better to have its own wiki or just be 
>> integrated with TWScripts?
>>
>> Part of the problem is that the category "developer" kinda blurrs in TW. 
>> I mean I'm NOT a developer but there are things in the plugin I 
>> understand & can use.
>>
>> So I'm not clear how its different than TWScripts, other than being a 
>> plugin?
>> I'd rather not have to visit two places when one will do?
>>
>> Just thoughts
>> Josiah
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3e8437dd-05f5-4389-a795-a6bab134772a%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to