Does NOT make sense. "Utility" is so generic it means "whatever". Its without a portfolio. So broad its meaningless.
This is *purely semantics*. I like the CONTENT but IMO the NAME is WRONG. Broad "Utility" is NOT what it is. BUT it does not matter since in GG everything goes into mush anyway. And anyone can name anything ANYTHING. So just do what you will do, already. Best wishes TT On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 19:37:43 UTC+2, Mohammad wrote: > > Hi Josiah, > > Yes, that's right! > Hopefully I will add more tools in future. > I use the utility title as it has some handy tools in plugin development > phase. > > --Mohammad > > > On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 at 8:17:52 PM UTC+3:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Ciao Mohammad >> >> I better understand it now. >> >> I want to re-phrase my comment. >> >> Is "Utility Plugin" the closest term to its aim? "Utility" is very >> generic. >> It lacks any definition of scope. >> >> But, from what you wrote, it seems more like a "Documentation Assistant"? >> >> Just a thought!!! No WAY do I dislike it. Just wonder if the naming is >> relevantly precise? >> >> Best wishes >> Josiah >> >> On Monday, 14 October 2019 22:02:54 UTC+2, Mohammad wrote: >>> >>> The Utility plugin is a set of tools can be used for any purpose! but it >>> is specially useful when you are writing something to explain the TW itself >>> or a plugin, script and like that! >>> So, in normal use one does not need to have wikitext-example macro! >>> >>> Tha't is the reason I said it is good for developer. >>> >>> It is different from TW-Script where, TW-Scripts is a resource and >>> TW-Utility is a plugin! and part of it cannot be found in TW-Scripts! >>> Furthermore TW-Scripts is a resource, a reference wiki NOT a plugin! >>> >>> --Mohammad >>> >>> On Monday, October 14, 2019 at 10:04:02 PM UTC+3:30, @TiddlyTweeter >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is to announce the *beta *release Utility plugin! It is a >>>>> complement to Shiraz. This plugin targets who like authoring specially >>>>> developer. >>>> >>>> >>>> Its good. Its useful. >>>> >>>> But I'm not sure (yet) whether its better to have its own wiki or just >>>> be integrated with TWScripts? >>>> >>>> Part of the problem is that the category "developer" kinda blurrs in >>>> TW. >>>> I mean I'm NOT a developer but there are things in the plugin I >>>> understand & can use. >>>> >>>> So I'm not clear how its different than TWScripts, other than being a >>>> plugin? >>>> I'd rather not have to visit two places when one will do? >>>> >>>> Just thoughts >>>> Josiah >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2b884647-17c3-4ca6-97d7-ce27192a4e93%40googlegroups.com.
