Hi The issue with markdown is its not fully compatable with TW's WikiText. > I find the markdown plugin is doing a decent job. Never had problems with it though it's pretty old. Also there will be an update using remarkable. My only regret is that you have to store metadata in another file when most of modern md systems store them in the file, just like .tid does for a long time.
It might be useful to provide Online Convertors in TW between formats? > Why not? It might. The problem is that such translators will restrain your output to "minimal common functionalities" of both language. A bit sad. I think plugins are a good way, even for beginners. I agree with the fact that TW is not so easy for beginners. And it's not so easy to convince new people to use it. BUT : - It is the price of freedom. I've been trying alternatives for years for good or bad reasons. I never found any tool that free my mind and work like TW. - The learning curve is adaptative. Soft if you need. Steep if you wish. One of the main issue is that you have plenty ways of doing the same thing. But it's rather a feature, isn't it? :-) Regards Sylvain @sycom Le dimanche 20 octobre 2019 14:48:44 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter a écrit : > > TonyM wrote: >> >> ... I think tiddlywiki has more options than most for capture and >> transfer. >> > > I think you are right AND wrong. > > I could NOT say there are that many "easy out of the box" methods. > I think TW is quite TOUGH on this for beginners. > > I could also say that ONCE you understand it anything is possible. > > It might be useful to provide Online Convertors in TW between formats? > > > TT > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4c2dbe22-3015-406a-9120-2197af429d28%40googlegroups.com.
