Ciao Birthe RIGHT. Exactly the point. I agree that actually those threads are "transients", not persisters.
However, IF using tags will to overcome GG limitations there needs be some kind of consistent idea about scope. If not it will become useless mush. BUT, would you, for instance, think THIS should be "sticky?" ... The-book. Weekly report. <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/SxbKhicBWwQ> ?? Best wishes TT Birthe C wrote: > > You put an important question. I love your threads, love to read what > other love about Tiddlywiki, and always like a smile or something to laugh > at. But still I would not want them tagged as "sticky". I find it important > to find some common ground in this matter. If too many threads are tagged > sticky it could end up being no help at all. > > > Birthe > > fredag den 25. oktober 2019 kl. 16.21.13 UTC+2 skrev @TiddlyTweeter: >> >> Long term users will have noticed that I curate occasional posts that >> are about reflection about, and general appreciation of, TW ... >> >> Some of us are discussing improving tags here so all users can find >> things more easily. >> So, I ask: would you want either of these threads tagged as "*sticky*"? >> (a kind of end-user defined "pin "). >> >> - I love TiddlyWiki because... >> >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tiddlywiki/kyCE8fLwUoU/7J8fiseeBwAJ> >> >> >> - TiddlySmile >> >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/april$20mackenzie%7Csort:date/tiddlywiki/Q9xsaypOKt0/sSJPuCB3BAAJ> >> >> Best wishes >> Josiah >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e6c9d7cb-832a-475b-a0fc-b503326f1936%40googlegroups.com.
