Ciao ℋ(ans)

HansWobbe wrote:
>
> Please consider that any (unique) string can be used as a effective Search 
> target.  It does not have to be a Tag (since there is a limit to the number 
> of Tags that can be applied to a Post.  e.g. Search for GgTwHw = G(oogle) 
> g(roups) T(iddly) w(iki) H(ans) w(obbe) and you should just get the two 
> responses that show this Post and the little test I am working on.
>

Right. But isn't that approach more about *finding your own posts? *I've 
done that a bit myself. By, for instance, using an ODD string on posts 
sometimes, e.g. "Houston, I have a problem 
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/houston$20I$20have$20a$20problem%7Csort:relevance>".
 
That helps ME find my posts. But it does not help anyone else as they won't 
know my weird phrase ... ?

My tentative idea with using tags more is to NARROW the search scope so you 
don't get deluged in irrelevant items. 
But it is best be used with a text search too. Here is an example that 
illustrates a decent narrow result: tag:announcement AND tag:resource AND 
"regexp"... 
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/tag$3Aannouncement$20AND$20tag$3Aresource$20AND$20%22regexp%22%7Csort:relevance>

If you just entered "regexp 
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/%22regexp%22%7Csort:relevance>"
 
you'd just get swamped. So tags, I think, may help us. The *downside* is 
tagging is voluntary on post. The *upside* is ANY user can add them later.

I've been using this trickery for years to place my personal (generally 
> Subject_Time) tags on tweets since that effectively makes twitter a great 
> repository for anything that I might want to retrieve latter.  
>

As a heavy user of Twitter i agree. Its hastaggery is particularly 
succinct. Same goes for Telegram. 
 

> It's a QuickAndDirty trick, but I find it invaluable; especially when 
> combined with IfTtt applets that execute whenever a tweet with a specific 
> tag appears.
>

Right! But what I'm trying to focus on most is getting best out of GG 
standard search :-). 

Think of it as building a MicroBotAgentArmy :-)
>

Do you know if there is a searchBot in IFTTT for GG?

Best wishes
TT 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/39caa832-d91a-4636-a2f1-3b985a285d74%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to