A Gloom wrote: > > > - TT: took me 6 months to realise that a "blank" ContentType is > actually "text/vnd.tiddlywiki" (yes?). BTW, WHY can it be BLANK? > > I believe not type set defaults to text/vnd.tiddlywiki but in my building > the Tiddler Explorer, using type[] brings up some tiddlers with no type set > that don't show as x-tiddler or text/vnd.tiddlywiki. In More tab> Types, > no type set ususally shows under x-tiddler while text/vnd.tiddlywiki is > excluded from the list there. Using type[text/vnd.tiddlywiki] in Advanced > search> Filter brings up only tiddlers that actually have > text/vnd.tiddlywiki set as a type. I think there's some extra background > filtering when TW determines what a tiddler type is when its not set, > x-tiddlers for type not set has widgets and such and not just plain text. > > ** note: using type[typename] should only display a type field with value > "typename" and not see type fields not set >
Not fully clear what you mean. Are you saying that a BLANK "Type" field could be an unpredictable format? > >> - It took me 9 months to realise that I could mix HTML code with >> WikiText. For a long time I was under the illusion that if I used HTML >> tags >> I must use ContentType "text/html". >> >> Exact opposite here-- being a web page author (old school with Notepad), > I mixed html with wikitext without setting txt/html from the get go and was > thinking I was doing it wrong > It is fascinating. Heft of it is maybe the docs are assuming something? I am not sure IF I am a bad reader or, actually, they implicitly assume something that a #newbie needs to explicitly know or not. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/82470625-26d7-476c-bf66-eb4e505f4633%40googlegroups.com.
