Nice idea. Another option is git instead of a database. On 28 November 2019 15:59:24 GMT-08:00, Arlen Beiler <[email protected]> wrote: >I have a radical proposal which would take data folders to the next >level. >What if instead of the file system adapter we would write a new adapter >to >use a database. We could use PouchDB, but I would vote for something >much >more widespread like SQLite. We could also write it in a generic way >that >makes it easy to use with the regular SQL databases. It would be easy >to >build but I would want to make it robust enough to use in a wide array >of >platforms. > >I have already worked with the tiddler loading code enough to be >certain it >is self contained and can easily be made asynchronous to accommodate >this >feature. Or the preload tiddlers feature can be used, but I think it’s >better to separate out the loaders as Jeremy has mentioned. > >Any thoughts on this or things I should keep in mind as I brainstorm? > >Arlen > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >an email to [email protected]. >To view this discussion on the web visit >https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAJ1vdSQ44gN-FO7TsNXM89nX5%3DfHE2hMyQNqDNR2zsw_nSraZA%40mail.gmail.com.
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8D000F5B-5FC7-49E8-8BED-EA8BBF05887E%40gmail.com.
