Ciao Jeremy I agree actually with all your and Jed's caveats. The expanded bureaucracy & fairness issues. But, after reflection, I now managed to pin down more precisely why I wrote that and what is implicit in it that would have been better explicit.
It is that *some* things going on are *quite large projects* that have major implications. I was thinking particularly of Jed & Arlen, though some Android work might also fall into the category. I have no answer other than to say some things are great innovations and some are major projects. Major projects are much harder to sustain without funding. Communities seem to work better without money. !!. Lol. Let's no go there. Best wishes Josiah Jeremy Ruston wrote .... > > The trouble is, as Jed suggests, that it's a lot more bureaucracy, and > there are a lot of challenges to make sure everybody is happy with the > decisions of the committee. Communities seem to work better without money. > > I would be very happy to feature individual fundraising links on > tiddlywiki.com, although again there's a lot we need to get right to be > sure that we're being fair. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/758ade23-1bc4-49f9-853d-b0dd75161140%40googlegroups.com.
