Jeremy, Please find response to each question/statement of yours. No offence intended.
> I think you’re suggesting that we give users the ability to limit the > tiddlers to which freelinks are created. That’s certainly a potential > performance improvement under consideration. > Not only limit the "tiddlers *to *which freelinks are created" but also the tiddler limit those "on which we display freelinks". > > Also once an "autolink" is established what about making it permanent with > square brackets added to the text. > > > Do you mean that the square brackets would be inserted any time a freelink > is created? Would they be removed if the target tiddler ceases to exist? It > sounds like a hybrid between the two approaches we’ve discussed: > Not any/everytime time, just should we wish to, on demand. The alternative to hard code by hand could be fiddly, can we automate this?. I believe the relink plugin can now handle renames. > > * The dynamic approach taken by the plugin where freelinks are ephemeral, > and created as required > Best for research, development and investigations, slower. > * The static approach of automatically creating explicit links when saving > a tiddler > Ideal for publishing and sharing, faster. Finally, your concern about my language. > > Just a very gentle note that the way you’ve expressed this paragraph makes > it read as an implicit criticism of the approach taken by somebody else in > the thread. That kind of thing gets in the way of the points you’re trying > to raise, and I’d urge you to reread postings to make sure your meaning is > clear without criticising others. If you feel that people aren’t listening > to your ideas then the most constructive response is to focus on expressing > them clearly and concisely. > With all due respect, I believe you read something into this, that is not there. There is nothing in my statement that is a criticism of any sort. It asks "please" and says "running down the performance rabbit hole again", AND not you, he or it named, But US (The collective "we"), it was raised in response to the key concern that "freelinking" raises - performance issues. I almost always re-read my posts and always consider how others may feel when posting, so you can expect me to do as you ask. Yet like many other posters, I assume an egoless discussion, amongst peers, where brevity is permitted as long as the meaning is clear. If you could point out how my sentence contains "implicit criticism" I would appreciate your view. Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4aed2a9b-b6c9-4aed-9a91-b24f7b8d1f7a%40googlegroups.com.
