Hi Tony

Eric’s explanation is correct. I understand that that is not the meaning that 
you intended to convey, hence bringing it to your attention. Apologies for 
derailing the discussion.

Best wishes

Jeremy.

> On 5 Jan 2020, at 09:11, Eric Shulman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Finally, your concern about my language.
>  
> 
> Just a very gentle note that the way you’ve expressed this paragraph makes it 
> read as an implicit criticism of the approach taken by somebody else in the 
> thread. That kind of thing gets in the way of the points you’re trying to 
> raise, and I’d urge you to reread postings to make sure your meaning is clear 
> without criticising others. If you feel that people aren’t listening to your 
> ideas then the most constructive response is to focus on expressing them 
> clearly and concisely.
> 
> With all due respect, I believe you read something into this, that is not 
> there. There is nothing in my statement that is a criticism of any sort. It 
> asks "please" and says "running down the performance rabbit hole again", AND 
> not you, he or it named, But US (The collective "we"), it was raised in 
> response to the key concern that "freelinking" raises - performance issues.
> 
> Language is a funny thing.  I'm reminded of a saying that I learned many 
> years ago:
> 
> "Half of communicating with others is deciding what you want to say... the 
> other half is avoiding them hearing what they think you said."
> 
> "Running down the rabbit hole" might seem to be merely a colorful expression; 
> however, it DOES carry some distinctly negative connotations:
> 
> https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/go+down+the+rabbit+hole 
> <https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/go+down+the+rabbit+hole>
> 
> " ... strange, problematic, difficult, complex, or chaotic... "
> 
> Implicit in the use of that phrase is the idea that such discussions are a 
> waste of time and effort and that those who choose to pursue those issues are 
> somehow being foolish or misguided in their focus, especially in comparison 
> to the approach that you are advocating.  While I'm certain that it was not 
> your intent, this can come across as somewhat dismissive and disrespectful of 
> other points of view.
> 
> Just a little food for thought...
> 
> -e
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4a13a7c9-f588-49a5-a1eb-4ce61635cea7%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4a13a7c9-f588-49a5-a1eb-4ce61635cea7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/F0031870-CA43-4931-AB34-DAA568B71E67%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to