Very interesting thread! Something I find missing though is thought on limits.
As far as I grasp it David wrote TiddlyWiki Toolmap in Dynalist because it was easiest in it. At over 600 entries it is well worth noting his AUTHOR experience. *Emulate that and you'd be on a winner :-).* But I don't see why TW should be perfect at everything. To ME the issue here is not ONLY about emulating "authoring" in a favorite tool per se. Rather, it is about much more about getting stuff INTO TW. Who cares where or how stuff is authored? Surely it is the final product that matters? What is the issue? ... David's ToolMap illustrates it well. It has a pretty simple OPML export format. Yet we don't do the obvious and just devise an importer! My point? WRITE in what is easiest. PUBLISH through TW which is about the most flexible tool around for organisation and search. Good as it is, TiddlyToolmap would be a MUCH more useful resource in TW. Just "left field" thoughts TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dacac991-da6d-4438-bd12-a9c4e958e029%40googlegroups.com.
