TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > My point? WRITE in what is easiest. PUBLISH through TW which is about the >> most flexible tool around for organisation and search. >> >> Good as it is, TiddlyToolmap would be a MUCH more useful resource in TW. >> > > Mark S. replied:
> What would TW bring to the table, for this particular application? You can > search it, view it, toggle sections, filter by tags, etc. (except there are > none -- but there could be if desired). > > That conversion step between writing and publishing would get tedious, > whereas it's instantaneous in TiddlyToolmap. > As usual with me my ability to make a solution is in the dark ages. You are right in that a TW published version of TiddlyWiki ToolMap might add nothing. I think it might. I did some attempts at a conversion but got stuck on my idiocy at coding. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9933d103-3146-4d3f-bac9-ca9c6bf0097d%40googlegroups.com.
