That's some fancy semantics.. I like the mane ;) Its funny though, when I look at Roam and what you are doing in blink I do not see bidirectional linking to be the goal/defining feature.
As I understand bidirectional linking. It is links that are bidirectional, two direction A to B and B to A. strictly speaking we have that in TW, but it is not automatic. The thing we lack in TW is to make these bidirectional links explicit, friction less and "attention grabbing". With my TOC generic I attempt to deal with the explicit and attention part (not that I know if it is the best way, just a way). But what I find fare more interesting in blink/roam, is the served and showed context (of links/relations). Bidirectional links is the messenger, the overview of context (in said links) is the message. Or am I completely off? Not to bash on your name - I like it, just thinking out loud of what it is we are doing here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1620d679-ca02-4ad8-8f76-9d46594406a2%40googlegroups.com.
