I was wondering what the convention for naming various components that could be used in transclusions.
1:You can have a script that does something. For instance it could be used search for tagged tiddlers and return a list of those tiddlers. It could be named GetTaggedTiddlers 2:In another tiddler possibly named ListMyTaggedTiddlers could be invoked by <<tiddler GetTaggedTiddlers with: mytiddlers>> 3:Say you then had another script that used that list of tiddlers to create a tiddler say, named MyBracketedList creating a hard coded list of links for use with .readBracketedList() The above is just off the top of my head it could get more complicated and of course the scripts could all be in one tiddler under section headings and some functions combined but I thought they should all have names if standing alone. Transclusion can be both a verb and a noun. So should we have names like transclusion-script, transcluded, transcluder and even transcludee (or even transcludette or El transcluder or La transcludee for languages that use gender for such things:-) All kidding aside it does become a problem when trying to write instructions and explanations. Eric combines author information (info), usage, variables and as sections tiddler to display all of this information and tags it transclusion. However they could all be separate needing names and/or consolidated to various degrees to make many nameless hybrids Should we develop some convention before a defacto comes into being? For note, template, macro, extension, plugin, tweak etc. While some of us know the loosely agreed conventions many are used interchangeably or completely wrong. Morris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=.
