As is typical when we try to bend the edges of what browsers are supposed to do, it seems that links of this size won’t work correctly everywhere under all circumstances, and so we probably need to be systematic in finding the places where we can safely use them.
> On 4 Feb 2020, at 16:55, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki > <[email protected]> wrote: > > What setting do I use if I want to make the empty edition the base? > The empty edition does not include the share plugin, and so will not load tiddlers from the location hash part of the address bar. > On 5 Feb 2020, at 09:10, Ste Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tried to bitly your long link....not a valis URL! I think the problem may just be a limit on the length of URLs. A short example like this works OK: https://bit.ly/382oArP > On 4 Feb 2020, at 23:35, TonyM <[email protected]> wrote: > > I must say I would point some loaded urls to tiddlywiki.com > <http://tiddlywiki.com/> because it has a larger set of tiddlers a large toc > etc... There are security risks around this plugin, in particular it makes it possible to construct certain phishing attacks: I can make a URL which accesses > On 4 Feb 2020, at 16:55, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also, is there a way that one or more of the included tiddlers could open in > the story? Like a permalink? So that users wouldn't have to rummage through > the "recent" tiddlers to get started. Just include $:/StoryList in the tiddlers that are shared. Best wishes Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/84980848-9927-4404-B718-7126B1E714EE%40gmail.com.
