So many exciting things happening on this forum, so little time. @david
>Links are better for sideways and one-level-up connections. Tags are better >for multi-level tables of contents. Yes that is why i use tags and links as i do. Tags are good for multi-level toc (as alo noted by @tiddlytweeter), but would it not be possible to use links for that also? Isn't that what you are doing David with blink? If not. Are you maybe no so interested in multi-level toc? >As Mark noted, long tags are terrible. Why? Many of my tags have space in them, and some are sentences long but i dont see the problem with that. I just seach for them and select. A d why would a long link be better? And I hope my poor spelling isn't a threat to the discussion in this thread :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5a425296-d8bd-43b4-8843-2d369758c77a%40googlegroups.com.
