Hi Mario > Please don't. IMO foo and bar are some of the most terrible placeholder > variable names in computer history. see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foobar
Sorry for the confusion. I’m using foobar and card as placeholders, and not suggesting that they be the new terms. > > Hmmm. Version 6.1.0 since it won't be backwards compatible. ... If we create > a non-compatible version we should do some heavy house cleaning and get rid > of the deprecated stuff. I think I addressed this with my comment of an upgrade/converter tool. > I think so, since the name seems to cause problems. foobar will also cause > problems, since it is a synonym for trash. I really thought it was blindingly obvious that I was using it as a placeholder! Why on earth would I suggest such a terrible name? > Incompatibility As I say I think I addressed that in my original post. > >> * Coming up with suggestions for the new name is relatively easy, but what >> are the criteria that we should use to test the new name? (We wouldn't want >> to have to change it again) > > >> * Should we seek to keep things simple by choosing a name that retains the >> TW initials? > > hmmm, the W is simple ... wiki ;) But equally people often tell me that “wiki” isnt a good term to describe TW :) Best wishes Jwremy > > -mario > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/afa4817e-fc00-4175-a6e6-be4d32880630%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/A49C911F-7878-4323-B97B-4866A40C6C44%40gmail.com.
