The decision is on one sense simple: Do enough people shy away because of the name? Yes = change No = don't change
The key word is, of course, "enough". So let's start estimating and reasoning. The name complaint has been recurring over the years (decades) and comes from different people. It is loudly brought up on average... I'd say 1-2 times a year? Not every time does it lead to a bigger discussion. In the bigger discussions some 5 people agree it is a problem (regardless if it is 1 or 2 times a year). This is in a user group of... how many active people? 100? So that's 5%. Or are we 500 people and it's 1%? ...However, most people are silent on the matter. We have no clue how many. Say, there's 10 more times silent people than there are loud mouths, who also find the name problematic. That makes 50%-10%. 50% doesn't sound at all reasonable. Say it's 20%. ...However, this is from the TW fan club! We are not really the concern here. Reasonably the dislike is more problematic among not-yet-fans. OK, we double the estimates which makes 40%. 4/10 who dismiss it because of the name. I don't trust this number at all, it sounds crazily high, but I did reason to get to it. Feel free to correct the estimations. Back to the original question: Is this "enought" to warrant a change? Would double be enough? Would a tenth of it (i.e 4/100) be enough? <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/67e6c061-d04f-4f44-a36a-d5112912a8b7%40googlegroups.com.
