The simple format yyyy-mm-dd is a lot more easy to read though. The TW-based macros I wrote after some suggestions from Mat* seem to be date agnostic. I can run this:
40 days from 1860-12-1 : <<daysfrom 1860 12 1 40>> > and get this: 40 days from 1860-12-1 : 1861-1-10 ** > Since I don't have my calendar from 1860/61 hanging around any more (the cat ate it), someone else will have to verify that it's correct. * Or someone ** Wikipedia tells me GE was written first 1860, but I suppose it was brushed up later? On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 9:39:08 AM UTC-8, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > This thread was helpful but I want to point to a simple issue. > > I want to import Dickens' novel "Great Expectations" edition of 1867. > > At the moment I will have to create a special date field for that since TW > dates start at 1899. > > That is cumbersome. IMO many users need simple creation dates prior to > 1899! > > TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6796e31d-9c7d-47ed-99f3-4884c222c461%40googlegroups.com.
