Hi Julio, A good summary of what TW can do. I think we all should wait renaming until another revision is going to uphold. It's like TW classic being updated to TW5 which was then a major revision (but no series of nicknames as the Apple iOS does). Ever since I believe many people are still using the classic version. TW5 should have been renamed back then.
So it's much better to wait until the next major revision (TWx or TW6) is coming and giving a new name and nickname as a start. It's a pretty common thing to use nicks in projects. handoko - On Monday, March 2, 2020 at 11:55:23 PM UTC+7, Julio Peña wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'll try my best to phrase my thoughts. > I've already seen some name samples > thrown out there in the other thread. > All we have to do is keep those creative juices > flowing until we hit on something everyone agrees upon:) > > In order to pick out a name one would > have to ponder the software (or platforms') attributes. > > 1. single html file > 2. many plugins already available > 3. adaptable to many environments > 4. lively community > 5. steady development for the foreseeable future > 6. etc. [much more] > > Those are just my thoughts. > > I think TiddlyWiki is mature enough for a name change. > I would definitely support it. > > On a personal level, however, name means nothing to me as I value > functionality over nomenclatures. > > I mean, as it is TiddlyWiki, is already a great note taking software! > > > All the best, > Julio > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b4a2bf72-828d-485d-8f0d-579884886f88%40googlegroups.com.
