Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > TiddlyWiki 5 already has a plugin library that has been open to > contributions for many years. However, we have found that plugin authors > prefer to publish plugins with their own infrastructure so that they have > more control. >
C'mon - is that really a fair description? In all practical terms, it is not possible for someone like me (nor, I assume, Mohammad) to get anything published there because it doesn't live up to the quality standards. And I must assume the process to qualify a plugin is as problematic as qualifying a regular PR, i.e there's a high chance that it just stays in limbo. Do I misunderstand something? (I hope I do.) <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4ff548a0-b286-42f1-ae63-b6c3d47e1b5d%40googlegroups.com.
