Hi Alex,
1) instead of:
temp.length+=1;
temp[temp.length-1]=a[i];
why not just...
temp.push(a[i]);
?
2) tiddlywiki has a native contains function used like this:
arr.contains(el);
so....
if(!contains(temp, a[i])){...
could just be...
if(!temp.contains(a[i])){...
3) why not use pushUnique to begin with and don't do any of that
uniqueArr() business to begin with...
all.pushUnique(list2);
?
4) However, if list2 actually is an array itself (haven't looked at it
that close)... you know that you'd be rather creating a subarray
within your 'all' array instead of adding individual items, right?
Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
