Mohammad
All good tools.
*Academic writing for publication is incredibly constrained *and any tools
to help it welcome!
I was thinking about what are the main issues for TW ...
-- For *Publication Layout* needs for journal styles. CSS could likely do
it in TW. *Not too difficult.*
-- For *Citations* the format needs vary by journal. *Zettlr* default is
"APA format" (APA = American Psychological Association) which is widely
used in humanities & social science.
Strict science tends to need more diverse citation schemes. The
variations of styling citations seems* the most complex issue*.
* I am not clear* how you could, in TW, fully support the full diversity
of citation schemes.
-- *Output/Export* to PDF, Word etc ... Point is academics need to publish
research & articles.
They need flexible export because different journals have
different requirements.
So you need flexible export, or good PDF "virtual printing".
I think that is achievable in TW.
It just needs* better attention to CSS print styling* (though
pagination remains a more complex problem).
Thoughts
TT
Mohammad wrote
>
>
> In this area of academic quality tools, and similar to TW, I also like to
> name these two:
>
> - https://academicpages.github.io/
> - https://mmistakes.github.io/minimal-mistakes/
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3c83e4a5-0725-47ce-9f06-b6c295257213%40googlegroups.com.
