I do like the transclude tiddler in popup upon hovering over a link. I know Anne-Laure Le Cunff was trying to replicate that feature.
Sliding the story river horizontally is kind of neat and over all fairly intuitive, but in one aspect is confusing - I clicked on a number of links, but then some were no longer open when I slide the scrollbar at the bottom. I think the idea is, notes opened from links in a note only open one at a time. If you click another link from the original note, the first note you opened from there will close and the second will replace it. The rule makes sense, it is just my years working with tiddlywiki that makes it confusing to me. I do like the 'clean' feel to it as a reading experience. No sidebar, just a minimal top bar. Feels like a 'dynamic' html produced by whatever app he is using. For my money, I would prefer the flexibility of TW. But I do admit it is nice-looking. On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 3:01:42 PM UTC-5, Mohammad wrote: > > Sorry to ask this question. Recently I see in twitter and also here there > is a talk on Andy notes page https://notes.andymatuschak.org/ > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnotes.andymatuschak.org%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNG8lPLN4x-rLjcrRChRflILSqP-yw> > , > Some people say it is very impressive. As a basic user of Tiddlywiki, I > think vanilla TW is better than Andy notes! > > Can anyone simply explain, what it has, TW does not have in empty.html > (vanilla version)? > > > --Mohammad > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/90f4664d-b624-4c55-9767-d603f31e668c%40googlegroups.com.
