I'm sure it's prior art, but Ward Cunningham, the godfather of wikis, created the Smallest Federated Wiki <http://2011/Smallest Federated Wiki> at IndieWebCamp 2011, which looks and acts a lot like Andy's wiki. Here's an example: http://fed.wiki/. If I recall correctly a lot of it was written in node.js and it's available on GitHub for those interested.
Incidentally, for those interested in wiki UI and blue sky ideas, I'm hosting a wiki-related IndieWebCamp session this weekend: https://events.indieweb.org/2020/04/gardens-and-streams-wikis-blogs-and-ui-a-pop-up-indiewebcamp-session-j9bg0pJDBgBD Everyone is welcome to join and it should be an interesting group of people. On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 3:33:47 PM UTC-7, Anne-Laure Le Cunff wrote: > > I just saw it! Looks amazing. Let's talk about it but I want to include > this in my TW static website generator tutorial, much easier to implement > than the way I went about it. Thank you! > > On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 11:20:13 PM UTC+1, David Gifford wrote: >> >> oh and I just sent you a clunky version I whipped up this afternoon! >> >> On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 5:13:26 PM UTC-5, Anne-Laure Le Cunff wrote: >>> >>> @David Thanks to a good friend who's very talented, I'm actually making >>> progress <https://mentalnodes.netlify.app/lorem-ipsum.html>! >>> >>> On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 9:37:17 PM UTC+1, David Gifford wrote: >>>> >>>> I do like the transclude tiddler in popup upon hovering over a link. I >>>> know Anne-Laure Le Cunff was trying to replicate that feature. >>>> >>>> Sliding the story river horizontally is kind of neat and over all >>>> fairly intuitive, but in one aspect is confusing - I clicked on a number >>>> of >>>> links, but then some were no longer open when I slide the scrollbar at the >>>> bottom. I think the idea is, notes opened from links in a note only open >>>> one at a time. If you click another link from the original note, the first >>>> note you opened from there will close and the second will replace it. The >>>> rule makes sense, it is just my years working with tiddlywiki that makes >>>> it >>>> confusing to me. >>>> >>>> I do like the 'clean' feel to it as a reading experience. No sidebar, >>>> just a minimal top bar. Feels like a 'dynamic' html produced by whatever >>>> app he is using. >>>> >>>> For my money, I would prefer the flexibility of TW. But I do admit it >>>> is nice-looking. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 3:01:42 PM UTC-5, Mohammad wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to ask this question. Recently I see in twitter and also here >>>>> there is a talk on Andy notes page https://notes.andymatuschak.org/ >>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnotes.andymatuschak.org%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNG8lPLN4x-rLjcrRChRflILSqP-yw> >>>>> , >>>>> Some people say it is very impressive. As a basic user of Tiddlywiki, >>>>> I think vanilla TW is better than Andy notes! >>>>> >>>>> Can anyone simply explain, what it has, TW does not have in empty.html >>>>> (vanilla version)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --Mohammad >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d4c31faf-54eb-4d00-9a26-ea72af28cca3%40googlegroups.com.
