Ciao Mat Its certainly true that the "quine" nature if TW often inspires underwhelm. I tried getting attention to it on Twitter to no avail. Even with hardened readers of fringe material.
So I broadly grasp it is not in your thought. Or most any other, YET. I think the issue devolves to concepts of function--do they help or not? For my kind of brain KNOWING TW is a quine helps a lot. But that is for another thread. Yours is Good without it. A dopo. Best wishes TT On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 17:42:53 UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> [...] I think it really aids understanding TW stand-alone >> > > In what way? I agree it is super cool conceptually but I just don't see *how > *it aids understanding. It is just a fact that "TW is a quine which means > <definition>". What else is there to say about it? > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b7057baf-1c6c-4211-8e5d-ee03b4e34b51%40googlegroups.com.
