Joshua That is a Good comment invoking Bucky Fuller. It gives some more meat to the bones of Quine.
IMO the Quine nature of TW matters a lot. It is often seen as "so what?" Actually it has real consequences that help. Like you, I know concepts of function matter. I hope we might get this better understood? Best wishes TT On Monday, 4 May 2020 01:16:20 UTC+2, Joshua Fontany wrote: > > Thanks for this, I think this realization has a lot of potential to allow > TW users to deeply explore certain "cognitive spaces" (//topics//). > > For example, I really need to get all of Buckminster Fuller's work into a > TW, especially his Synergenics. > > TiddlyWiki is a Quine, a Quine is a *Software Pattern Integrity* (Fuller): > > “Pattern Integrity is when a pattern has integrity independent of the > medium by virtue of which you have received the information that it > exists.” - Bucky Fuller > > All triangles share certain inherent properties that allow one to > recognize it AS a triangle, even though no two individual manifest > triangles "are the same". > > Same holds true for TiddlyWikis. > > Best, > Joshua Fontany > > On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 4:57:33 AM UTC-7, TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> TonyM wrote: >>> >>> >>> Perhaps if you call it a non-trivial Quine, some may notice. >>> >> >> It is called TiddlyWiki. TW is a functional Quine. >> >> Notice what you are using it already. Everyday in everyway. >> >> It WILL get notice as a Quine when users realise it is one routinely. >> >> TT >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/227125d4-21c3-4bb7-af4f-cebf4821e51f%40googlegroups.com.
