On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 8:21:55 PM UTC+2, Tony K wrote: .. > I am sorry if I offended you in any way >
No offence taken. ... I think, it is a good idea to have a possibility to switch from "feelinks" to "real links" in a simple way. ... As always I personally want to be "in control". That's why I think, global research and replace is a little bit of an overkill. Eg: If I would import content from a "non TiddlyWiki source", freelinks is a valid option to get "initial" linking. ... Later in the process of "reviewing", I think "free linking" should be replaced by "real linking". ... Core processing is faster and imo much more precise, from an authors point of view. --------- brainstorming TW freelinks plubin already contains functions, that let us *search* for existing tiddlers and provides a function to create a regexp to identify tiddler titles in a given tiddler text. IMO that's already half way of the functionality, we need to create the missing "replace" in wikitext function. ... If a tiddler is in edit mode, the user has maximum control, because there is the Cancel button, which restores the existing content, if freelink -> real-link doesn't work as expected. I think: Even if I need to edit 100+ tiddlers, a "high quality" review should be doable in an appropriate amount of time of 2h. "low quality" should be much faster. just my thoughts mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fb6ebd12-d1ed-42d6-ae33-8ebbbe682442%40googlegroups.com.
