Ciao TonyM ... > > > How do I decide? For me its based on decades of experience in IT with a > conceptual approach to understanding and negotiating my way through > complexity. > > Although I actively try and find ways to make my implicit knowledge > explicit. >
Very good note. I picked out two great points to underline ... > ... meta concepts I am developing on tiddlywiki is rapid and reiterative > design methods Right. Reiteration. Recursive. Self-aware. My point is this: TW is quite unusual in actually reasonably supporting human cyclic cognitive process. Of course NO computer yet can work as well on *the liminal* that humans constantly sense, build, and act from. But I'd guess the "fragment/tiddler" is quite close. It encourages *appropriate reduction to salient partitions.* ... the answer to your question is a process rather than a rule. Right. The heart parts are "fragment" yet "fragment" is not what it might first look like. Good fragments are tempered by your mind working in context for purpose. Thanks! TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c70224b4-fba4-4e0c-b36b-4da746cdb646%40googlegroups.com.
