TT Your welcome, I appreciate yout raising conceptual and philosophical issues about tiddlywiki.
Thanks Tony On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 11:19:16 PM UTC+10, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao TonyM ... >> >> >> How do I decide? For me its based on decades of experience in IT with a >> conceptual approach to understanding and negotiating my way through >> complexity. >> >> Although I actively try and find ways to make my implicit knowledge >> explicit. >> > > Very good note. I picked out two great points to underline ... > > >> ... meta concepts I am developing on tiddlywiki is rapid and reiterative >> design methods > > > Right. Reiteration. Recursive. Self-aware. > > My point is this: TW is quite unusual in actually reasonably supporting > human cyclic cognitive process. > Of course NO computer yet can work as well on *the liminal* that humans > constantly sense, build, and act from. > But I'd guess the "fragment/tiddler" is quite close. > It encourages *appropriate reduction to salient partitions.* > > ... the answer to your question is a process rather than a rule. > > > Right. The heart parts are "fragment" yet "fragment" is not what it might > first look like. > Good fragments are tempered by your mind working in context for purpose. > > Thanks! > TT > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0664ad05-39c9-4069-907f-9c2a310f2b4a%40googlegroups.com.
